Gareth's Downstairs Computer
2018-02-06 13:51:00 UTC
so minuted in the reports of a committee or a board
meeting, and it uses the RSGB name, there can be no
doubt that it is an official RSGB facility.
In addition, on their website, the RSGB say that all subscribers
to that discussion group must obey the RSGB rules about
But that can only mean the behaviour once that discussion
group is joined, and not in some imagined fraction of the
rules beforehand, else how can someone with a history of
posting abusive messages on the Internet about Asperger's
Syndrome and about employment limited to lavatory cleaning
be not only a subscriber to that discussion group but also
a manager of that group?
Is there a double standard being applied, or is it
merely the disingenuity of the RSGB for which they
have become renowned in recent years?
It was bad enough that the RSGB kicked its former
supporters in the teeth when the bequeathed historical
equipment was binned and the acquisition of its own
headquarters by the investers of the Lamba Investment
company was substituted by a rented slum juxta the
sewage works of Bedford, but this treatment of _REAL_
radio amateurs being refused a subscription to RSGBTech
really shows up the RSGB, its board of directors, and
its former directors for what they really are.
Do not forget that it was the RSGB who petitioned for
the introduction of the 3-tier coffer-filling fiasco to
the detrimant of _REAL_ amateur radio in Brit.